Perversion and social innovation: the Minotaur, the labyrinth, Ariadne, Theseus, and Attica
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Psychoanalysis has been interested in myths since its foundation, arousing both interest and criticism from scholars of historical and anthropological disciplines: on the one hand, in fact, the psychoanalytic model allows us to explain the creative processes that generated them and the attractiveness that they exercised on ancient populations, and on the other hand presents limits of congruence with the data that historical and literary research associates with them. This work proposes an integrated analytical approach, which associates historical and literary evidence with an analytic method that integrates the interpretation of symbols, specifically those of perversion, within the narrative structure, considering both elements significant. A decoding of the myth of the Labyrinth and the Minotaur will therefore be conducted, as it was used in that of Theseus, Ariadne and the foundation of Attica.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.